Honor 80 Pro Flat vs Honor X40 GT Racing
Comparing the Honor 80 Pro Flat (2023) and the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 80 Pro Flat leads — 45/100 vs 30/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 160 MP vs 50 MP.
Honor 80 Pro Flat
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Better main camera: 160MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 186g vs 199g
- Higher performance (22/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (67/100 vs 51/100)
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Overall rating 30/100
Comparing the Honor 80 Pro Flat vs the Honor X40 GT Racing, the Honor 80 Pro Flat scores 15 points higher (45/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor 80 Pro Flat leads (22/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 80 Pro Flat leads (50/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor 80 Pro Flat notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (22/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor 80 Pro Flat notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (50/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "design" category, the Honor 80 Pro Flat notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (67/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor 80 Pro Flat | Honor X40 GT Racing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 1425446 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 160 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×75.3×7.9 mm | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 199 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor 80 Pro Flat
- Main: 160MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Honor 80 Pro Flat
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor 80 Pro Flat
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor 80 Pro Flat notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (22/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 80 Pro Flat notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (50/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 80 Pro Flat notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (67/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor 80 Pro Flat or the Honor X40 GT Racing?
The Honor 80 Pro Flat is noticeably better than the Honor X40 GT Racing — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 80 Pro Flat and the Honor X40 GT Racing?
The Honor 80 Pro Flat has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Honor X40 GT Racing — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 80 Pro Flat or the Honor X40 GT Racing?
The Honor 80 Pro Flat leads on camera score (50/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 80 Pro Flat or the Honor X40 GT Racing?
The Honor 80 Pro Flat leads on performance (22/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor 80 Pro Flat over the Honor X40 GT Racing?
The Honor 80 Pro Flat is a better fit for everyday use. The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use.