Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Pova 6
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Pova 6 (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova 6 leads — 36/100 vs 30/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 6 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Pova 6
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 206g
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 42/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 70W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (35/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 43/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Pova 6, the Tecno Pova 6 scores 6 points higher (36/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 leads (58/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 6 leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 6 is a bit better (35/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (58/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 6 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (96/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Pova 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 70W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, HIOS 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP53 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 166.2×76.8×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 206 g | |
| Price | — | $200 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova 6
- Main: 108MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Pova 6
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova 6
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 6 is a bit better (35/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (58/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 6 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Pova 6?
The Tecno Pova 6 edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova 6?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Pova 6 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Pova 6?
The Tecno Pova 6 leads on camera score (35/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Pova 6?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Pova 6 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.