Honor 70 vs OPPO Reno 16 FS
The Honor 70 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, while the OPPO Reno 16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads — 42/100 vs 38/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 FS has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 54 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor 70 is noticeably lighter (178g vs 194g).
Honor 70
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 54MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 178g vs 194g
- Better design/ergonomics (77/100 vs 57/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4800 mAh
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (62/100 vs 53/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 43/100)
- Better value for money (72/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor 70 vs the OPPO Reno 16 FS, the OPPO Reno 16 FS scores 4 points higher (42/100 vs 38/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads (72/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Honor 70 are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (62/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 70 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (77/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the Honor 70 (72/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 70 | OPPO Reno 16 FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | — | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 115 | — | |
| Main camera | 54 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×73.3×7.9 mm | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 178 g | 194 g | |
| Price | — | $549 |
Honor 70
- Main: 54MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor 70
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 70
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Honor 70
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Honor 70 are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (62/100 vs 53/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 70 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (77/100 vs 57/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the Honor 70 (72/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 70 or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS edges out the Honor 70 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 70 and the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Honor 70 has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the OPPO Reno 16 FS — 42/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 70 or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS leads on camera score (62/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Honor 70 over the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Honor 70 is a better fit for everyday use. The OPPO Reno 16 FS is a better fit for everyday use.