Honor 600e vs Vivo iQOO 15T
The Honor 600e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7100 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $550 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 62/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6520); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Honor 600e is noticeably lighter (180g vs 216g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 600e
Vivo iQOO 15T
What makes Honor 600e better?
- Lighter: 180g vs 216g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6520 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $550
- Better camera (65/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 69/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 600e vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 20 points higher (82/100 vs 62/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (65/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Honor 600e — 42/100, Vivo iQOO 15T — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Honor 600e (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Honor 600e (65/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (75/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (79/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 600e | Vivo iQOO 15T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4704310 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2600 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6520 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP66 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 157.4×75.4×7.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 180 g | 216 g | |
| Launch price | $550 | $499 |
Camera comparison
Honor 600e
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Honor 600e
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 600e
- 6520 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $51. Vivo iQOO 15T was $51 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Honor 600e (99/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Honor 600e (65/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (75/100 vs 69/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (79/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 600e or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Honor 600e by 20 points (82/100 vs 62/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 600e and the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Honor 600e has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 600e or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Honor 600e over the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.