Honor 600 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor 600 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $549 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 600 Pro leads — 84/100 vs 69/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 600 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the Honor 600 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,038,473 vs 2,926,532); the Honor 600 Pro is noticeably lighter (190g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 600 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor 600 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3038473 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 190g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $549 vs $2899
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (69/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 600 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Honor 600 Pro scores 15 points higher (84/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro leads (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro leads (83/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Honor 600 Pro — 86/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor 600 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 600 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 600 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (69/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 600 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3038473 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.6" OLED LTPS | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2600x1200 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $549 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor 600 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor 600 Pro
- 6.6" OLED LTPS
- Resolution: 2600x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 600 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:25 hrs, total 29:53 hrs
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 600 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor 600 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 3.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2350. Honor 600 Pro was $2350 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor 600 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 600 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 600 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (69/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 600 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 600 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 600 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 600 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 600 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 600 Pro leads on camera score (78/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Honor 600 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 600 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.