Honor 600 Pro (China) vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Honor 600 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 600 Pro (China) leads — 79/100 vs 75/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 8000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 2,120,347); the Honor 600 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (202g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 600 Pro (China)
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Honor 600 Pro (China) better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 202g vs 225g
- Better camera (78/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 2120347
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6405
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 8000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 77/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 600 Pro (China) vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Honor 600 Pro (China) scores 4 points higher (79/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) leads (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 600 Pro (China) (95/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) is a bit better (86/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (59/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 600 Pro (China) | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 2120347 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2728 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 156.1×74.8×7.9 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 202 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | — | $548 |
Camera comparison
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2728
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 600 Pro (China) and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Honor 600 Pro (China) by 40.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 600 Pro (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 600 Pro (China) (95/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (78/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) is a bit better (86/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (59/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) edges out the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 600 Pro (China) and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) leads on camera score (78/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Honor 600 Pro (China) over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.