Honor 400 vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Honor 400 (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $449 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 44/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 400 has the bigger battery (5300 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,087,371); the Honor 400 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 285g).
Honor 400
Motorola Razr Fold
- Bigger battery: 5300 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 184g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $449 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (57/100 vs 51/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (70/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (79/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1087371
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2967
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 6/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Honor 400 vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 33 points higher (77/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 6/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 400 leads (79/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (92/100 vs 6/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 is a bit better (57/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 400 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (70/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 400 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Honor 400 | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1087371 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2967 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2736 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 156.5×74.6×7.3 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 285 g | |
| Price | $449 | $1799 |
Honor 400
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor 400
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2736
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 400
- 5300 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Honor 400 and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Honor 400 by 72.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1350. Honor 400 is cheaper by $1350.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (92/100 vs 6/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (91/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 is a bit better (57/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 400 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (70/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor 400 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Honor 400 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor 400 by 33 points (77/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 400 and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor 400 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 77/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 6/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor 400 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.