Honor 400 Pro vs OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
The Honor 400 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $460 and $661. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 80/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 2,243,804).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Pro
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
What makes Honor 400 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Cheaper at launch: $460 vs $661
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 2243804
- Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 Pro vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 7 points higher (87/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 78/100). Value score: Honor 400 Pro — 84/100, OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Honor 400 Pro (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 83/100. In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 Pro | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 2243804 | 3032039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 2725 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 8932 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.8×76.1×8.1 mm | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | $460 | $661 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Honor 400 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:11 hrs, total 24:36 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 Pro and OPPO Reno16 Pro (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Honor 400 Pro by 26.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $201. Honor 400 Pro was $201 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Honor 400 Pro (94/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 83/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Pro or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) edges out the Honor 400 Pro by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The Honor 400 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Pro or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Pro or the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on performance (90/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Pro over the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)?
The Honor 400 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.