Honor 400 Lite vs Vivo Y32t
The Honor 400 Lite (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 400 Lite leads — 38/100 vs 11/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 400 Lite has the bigger battery (5230 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor 400 Lite has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Honor 400 Lite is thinner (7.3mm vs 8.3mm).
Honor 400 Lite
Vivo Y32t
- Bigger battery: 5230 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 171g vs 179g
- Higher performance (1/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (40/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (86/100 vs 76/100)
- Better value for money (92/100 vs 55/100)
- Overall rating 11/100
Comparing the Honor 400 Lite vs the Vivo Y32t, the Honor 400 Lite scores 27 points higher (38/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Lite leads (40/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 400 Lite leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor 400 Lite and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (40/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (45/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (92/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 400 Lite | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 806012 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2398 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5230 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 9 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP65 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×74.6×7.3 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 171 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $261 | — |
Honor 400 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor 400 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Honor 400 Lite
- 5230 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Honor 400 Lite and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (40/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (45/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (86/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (92/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 400 Lite or the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 27 points (38/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Lite and the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 400 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Lite or the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 400 Lite leads on camera score (40/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Lite over the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 400 Lite is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.