Honor 400 Lite vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Honor 400 Lite (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $249 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 54/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5230); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is faster in AnTuTu (2,786,169 vs 668,462); the Honor 400 Lite is noticeably lighter (171g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Lite
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Honor 400 Lite better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 171g vs 212g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $280
- Better camera (43/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (84/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2786169 vs 668462
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 969
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 2321
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5230 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 35W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 Lite vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 17 points higher (71/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (88/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Honor 400 Lite — 58/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (88/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (73/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (84/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 Lite | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7025 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 668462 | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 969 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2321 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5230 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×74.6×7.3 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 171 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $249 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Honor 400 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Lite
- 5230 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 Lite and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads Honor 400 Lite by 76.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $31. Honor 400 Lite was $31 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (88/100 vs 49/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (73/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (84/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Lite or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is noticeably better than the Honor 400 Lite — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Lite and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Honor 400 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Lite or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Honor 400 Lite leads on camera score (43/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Lite or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on performance (88/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Lite over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.