Honor 400 Lite vs Poco F9 Pro
The Honor 400 Lite (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Poco F9 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $249 and $699. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Pro leads — 84/100 vs 54/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F9 Pro has the bigger battery (6330 mAh vs 5230); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,228,426 vs 668,462); the Honor 400 Lite is noticeably lighter (171g vs 206g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Lite
Poco F9 Pro
What makes Honor 400 Lite better?
- Lighter: 171g vs 206g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $699
- Better portability (84/100 vs 47/100)
What makes Poco F9 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3228426 vs 668462
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 969
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2321
- Bigger battery: 6330 vs 5230 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 35W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 49/100)
- Better camera (74/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 Lite vs the Poco F9 Pro, the Poco F9 Pro scores 30 points higher (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (95/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (84/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Honor 400 Lite — 58/100, Poco F9 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (95/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Poco F9 Pro (84/100 vs 47/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 Lite | Poco F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 668462 | 3228426 | |
| Geekbench Single | 969 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2321 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1156x2510 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 185 Hz | |
| Battery | 5230 mAh | 6330 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×74.6×7.3 mm | 157.5×75.3×8.8 mm | |
| Weight | 171 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | $249 | $699 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco F9 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 400 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F9 Pro
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1156x2510
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Lite
- 5230 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Poco F9 Pro
- 6330 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 Lite and Poco F9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F9 Pro leads Honor 400 Lite by 79.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $450. Honor 400 Lite was $450 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (95/100 vs 49/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (74/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (84/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Poco F9 Pro (84/100 vs 47/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Lite or the Poco F9 Pro?
The Poco F9 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite by 30 points (84/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Lite and the Poco F9 Pro?
The Honor 400 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Poco F9 Pro — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Lite or the Poco F9 Pro?
The Poco F9 Pro leads on camera score (74/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Lite or the Poco F9 Pro?
The Poco F9 Pro leads on performance (95/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Lite over the Poco F9 Pro?
The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.