Honor 400 Lite vs Poco F7 Ultra
The Honor 400 Lite (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $249 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Ultra leads — 82/100 vs 54/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Ultra has the bigger battery (5300 mAh vs 5230); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,932,885 vs 668,462); the Honor 400 Lite is noticeably lighter (171g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Lite
Poco F7 Ultra
What makes Honor 400 Lite better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 171g vs 212g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $500
- Better portability (84/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2932885 vs 668462
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 969
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2321
- Bigger battery: 5300 vs 5230 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 35W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 49/100)
- Better camera (71/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 Lite vs the Poco F7 Ultra, the Poco F7 Ultra scores 28 points higher (82/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (71/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Honor 400 Lite — 58/100, Poco F7 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (90/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (71/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (84/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 Lite | Poco F7 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 668462 | 2932885 | |
| Geekbench Single | 969 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2321 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5230 mAh | 5300 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×74.6×7.3 mm | 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 171 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $249 | $500 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco F7 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 400 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Lite
- 5230 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Poco F7 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 Lite and Poco F7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Ultra leads Honor 400 Lite by 77.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $251. Honor 400 Lite was $251 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (90/100 vs 49/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (71/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (84/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (84/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Lite or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite by 28 points (82/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Lite and the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Honor 400 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Poco F7 Ultra — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Lite or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra leads on camera score (71/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Lite or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra leads on performance (90/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Lite over the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.