Honor 200 vs Vivo Y32t
The Honor 200 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 200 leads — 47/100 vs 11/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 200 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor 200 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Honor 200
Vivo Y32t
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (5/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (65/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (62/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 187g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Honor 200 scores 36 points higher (47/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 leads (65/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 leads (62/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 leads (82/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (5/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 200 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (65/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (62/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 66/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (82/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 1002480 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2967 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 2664x1200 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 130 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×74.6×7.7 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $399 | — |
Honor 200
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.95
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor 200
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2664x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Honor 200
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (5/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 200 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (65/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (62/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 66/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (82/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 200 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 36 points (47/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 200 has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 200 leads on camera score (65/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 200 leads on performance (5/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor 200 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.