HMD Vibe 2 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The HMD Vibe 2 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $180 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 48/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 528,398); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the HMD Vibe 2 Pro doesn't; the HMD Vibe 2 Pro is noticeably lighter (197g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
HMD Vibe 2 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes HMD Vibe 2 Pro better?
- Lighter: 197g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $180 vs $950
- Better portability (62/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the HMD Vibe 2 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 43 points higher (91/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 53/100). Value score: HMD Vibe 2 Pro — 62/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the HMD Vibe 2 Pro (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the HMD Vibe 2 Pro (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the HMD Vibe 2 Pro (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the HMD Vibe 2 Pro (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the HMD Vibe 2 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | HMD Vibe 2 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 528398 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $180 | $950 |
Camera comparison
HMD Vibe 2 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
HMD Vibe 2 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
HMD Vibe 2 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared HMD Vibe 2 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads HMD Vibe 2 Pro by 87.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $770. HMD Vibe 2 Pro was $770 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the HMD Vibe 2 Pro (99/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the HMD Vibe 2 Pro (89/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the HMD Vibe 2 Pro (96/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the HMD Vibe 2 Pro (85/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the HMD Vibe 2 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the HMD Vibe 2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the HMD Vibe 2 Pro by 43 points (91/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the HMD Vibe 2 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The HMD Vibe 2 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the HMD Vibe 2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the HMD Vibe 2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the HMD Vibe 2 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.