HMD Pulse+ vs Itel Zeno 200

The HMD Pulse+ (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606, while the Itel Zeno 200 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7250. By overall MobileRank rating, the HMD Pulse+ leads — 34/100 vs 33/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the HMD Pulse+ has NFC for contactless payments, the Itel Zeno 200 doesn't.

The HMD Pulse+ edges out the Itel Zeno 200 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

HMD Pulse+

Performance 27
Display 44
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 61
Value for money —

Itel Zeno 200

Performance 32
Display 55
Camera 10
Battery 43
Portability 74
Value for money —

What makes HMD Pulse+ better?

  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP

  • Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)

What makes Itel Zeno 200 better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 600 vs 378
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1800 vs 1335
  • Faster charging: 15W vs 10W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Lighter: 185g vs 187g

  • Higher performance (32/100 vs 27/100)
  • Better display (55/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better portability (74/100 vs 61/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the HMD Pulse+ vs the Itel Zeno 200, the HMD Pulse+ scores 1 points higher (34/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the HMD Pulse+ leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Itel Zeno 200 is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Itel Zeno 200 is a bit better (55/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the HMD Pulse+ notably outperforms the Itel Zeno 200 (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Itel Zeno 200 is a bit better (74/100 vs 61/100).

Specs comparison

Specification HMD Pulse+ Itel Zeno 200
Processor Unisoc T606 Unisoc T7250
AnTuTu 333647 —
Geekbench Single 378 600
Geekbench Multi 1335 1800
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 720x1612 720x1600
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 10W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 13 MP
Front camera 8 MP 5 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 4GB
Storage 128GB 128GB
OS Android 14 Android 15 Go
Brightness (peak) 600 nits —
NFC yes no
Protection — IP65
Dimensions 163.2×75.0×8.5 mm —
Weight 187 g 185 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

HMD Pulse+

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Itel Zeno 200

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Display comparison

HMD Pulse+

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display

Itel Zeno 200

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Battery and charging

HMD Pulse+

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Itel Zeno 200

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Itel Zeno 200 is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Itel Zeno 200 is a bit better (55/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the HMD Pulse+ notably outperforms the Itel Zeno 200 (30/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.

portability

In the "portability" category, the Itel Zeno 200 is a bit better (74/100 vs 61/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the HMD Pulse+ or the Itel Zeno 200?

The HMD Pulse+ edges out the Itel Zeno 200 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the HMD Pulse+ and the Itel Zeno 200?

The HMD Pulse+ has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Itel Zeno 200 — 33/100.

Which has the better camera: the HMD Pulse+ or the Itel Zeno 200?

The HMD Pulse+ leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the HMD Pulse+ or the Itel Zeno 200?

The Itel Zeno 200 leads on performance (32/100 vs 27/100).

Should you choose the HMD Pulse+ over the Itel Zeno 200?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the HMD Pulse+ (30/100 vs 10/100).