HMD Aura 2 vs Itel Zeno 200
The HMD Aura 2 (2025) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A, while the Itel Zeno 200 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Itel Zeno 200 leads — 33/100 vs 20/100 (a 13-point difference).
Profile comparison
Category scores
HMD Aura 2
Itel Zeno 200
What makes HMD Aura 2 better?
- Overall rating 20/100
What makes Itel Zeno 200 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 600 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1800 vs 846
- Faster charging: 15W vs 10W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (32/100 vs 9/100)
- Better display (55/100 vs 31/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the HMD Aura 2 vs the Itel Zeno 200, the Itel Zeno 200 scores 13 points higher (33/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Itel Zeno 200 leads (32/100 vs 9/100). In the "performance" category, the Itel Zeno 200 notably outperforms the HMD Aura 2 (32/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Itel Zeno 200 notably outperforms the HMD Aura 2 (55/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Itel Zeno 200 notably outperforms the HMD Aura 2 (74/100 vs 57/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | HMD Aura 2 | Itel Zeno 200 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A | Unisoc T7250 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | 600 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | 1800 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 576x1280 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14 Go | Android 15 Go | |
| Brightness (peak) | 460 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.9×9.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 185 g | 185 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
HMD Aura 2
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Itel Zeno 200
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
HMD Aura 2
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 576x1280
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Itel Zeno 200
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
HMD Aura 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Itel Zeno 200
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Itel Zeno 200 notably outperforms the HMD Aura 2 (32/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Itel Zeno 200 notably outperforms the HMD Aura 2 (55/100 vs 31/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Itel Zeno 200 notably outperforms the HMD Aura 2 (74/100 vs 57/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the HMD Aura 2 or the Itel Zeno 200?
The Itel Zeno 200 is noticeably better than the HMD Aura 2 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the HMD Aura 2 and the Itel Zeno 200?
The HMD Aura 2 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Itel Zeno 200 — 33/100.
Which is more powerful: the HMD Aura 2 or the Itel Zeno 200?
The Itel Zeno 200 leads on performance (32/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the HMD Aura 2 over the Itel Zeno 200?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Itel Zeno 200 (55/100 vs 31/100).