Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Poco F9 Pro

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Poco F9 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $699. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Pro leads — 84/100 vs 74/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F9 Pro has the bigger battery (6330 mAh vs 5060); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,228,426 vs 1,672,795); the Poco F9 Pro is noticeably lighter (206g vs 221g).

The Poco F9 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

Performance 74
Display 86
Camera 88
Battery 57
Portability 41
Value for money 58

Poco F9 Pro

Performance 95
Display 91
Camera 74
Battery 84
Portability 47
Value for money 82

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?


  • Better camera (88/100 vs 74/100)

What makes Poco F9 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3228426 vs 1672795
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1900
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5200
  • Bigger battery: 6330 vs 5060 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 37W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 23W
  • Lighter: 206g vs 221g
  • Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 74/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (91/100 vs 86/100)
  • Better portability (47/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Poco F9 Pro, the Poco F9 Pro scores 10 points higher (84/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (95/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (84/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — 58/100, Poco F9 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (95/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (88/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (84/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 41/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Poco F9 Pro: The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Poco F9 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1672795 3228426
Geekbench Single 1900 3639
Geekbench Multi 5200 11047
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 1156x2510
Refresh rate 120 Hz 185 Hz
Battery 5060 mAh 6330 mAh
Charging 37W 100W
Wireless charging 23W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 160 —
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 42 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 157.5×75.3×8.8 mm
Weight 221 g 206 g
Launch price $1099 $699

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
88
camera

Poco F9 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
74
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
86
display

Poco F9 Pro

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1156x2510
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
91
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • 5060 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
57
battery

Poco F9 Pro

  • 6330 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Poco F9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4
74/100
1672795 AnTuTu
Poco F9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +48.2%
3228426 AnTuTu

Poco F9 Pro leads Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 48.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

$1099

Poco F9 Pro

$699

Launch price difference: $400. Poco F9 Pro was $400 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (95/100 vs 74/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (88/100 vs 74/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (84/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Poco F9 Pro?

The Poco F9 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Poco F9 Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Poco F9 Pro — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Poco F9 Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 74/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Poco F9 Pro?

The Poco F9 Pro leads on performance (95/100 vs 74/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Poco F9 Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.