Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Poco F7 Ultra

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Ultra leads — 71/100 vs 53/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Ultra has the bigger battery (5300 mAh vs 5060); the Poco F7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,931,492 vs 1,585,585).

The Poco F7 Ultra is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Performance 26
Display 100
Camera 88
Battery 46
Design 23
Value for money 34
Poco F7 Ultra
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 67
Battery 76
Design 35
Value for money 75
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?

  • Better camera (88/100 vs 67/100)
What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2931492 vs 1585585
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1900
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 5200
  • Bigger battery: 5300 vs 5060 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 37W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 23W
  • Lighter: 212g vs 221g
  • Cheaper: $500 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (67/100 vs 26/100)
  • Longer battery life (76/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (35/100 vs 23/100)
  • Better value for money (75/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Poco F7 Ultra, the Poco F7 Ultra scores 18 points higher (71/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (67/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (76/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (75/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (67/100 vs 26/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (88/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (76/100 vs 46/100). In the "design" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 23/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (75/100 vs 34/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.
Poco F7 Ultra: The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Poco F7 Ultra
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1585585 2931492
Geekbench Single 1900 3050
Geekbench Multi 5200 9300
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5060 mAh 5300 mAh
Charging 37W 120W
Wireless charging 23W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 160
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 32 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 42 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm
Weight 221 g 212 g
Price $1099 $500
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
88
camera
Poco F7 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
67
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Poco F7 Ultra
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • 5060 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
46
battery
Poco F7 Ultra
  • 5300 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
76
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Poco F7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4
53/100
1585585 AnTuTu
Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 +45.9%
2931492 AnTuTu

Poco F7 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 45.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
$1099
Poco F7 Ultra
$500

Price difference: $599. Poco F7 Ultra is cheaper by $599.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (67/100 vs 26/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (88/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (76/100 vs 46/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 23/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (75/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Poco F7 Ultra is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Poco F7 Ultra — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Poco F7 Ultra leads on performance (67/100 vs 26/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.