Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

The Google Pixel 9 Pro (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 72/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4700); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,606,238); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.5mm).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro

Performance 73
Display 88
Camera 80
Battery 50
Portability 54
Value for money 54

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

Performance 98
Display 80
Camera 50
Battery 52
Portability 74
Value for money —

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro better?

  • Lighter: 199g vs 201g

  • Better camera (80/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 80/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1606238
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1880
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5100
  • Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 37W

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 73/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better portability (74/100 vs 54/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 2 points higher (74/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro leads (80/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (98/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro is a bit better (88/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (80/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Google Pixel 9 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (74/100 vs 54/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro: The Google Pixel 9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Processor Google Tensor G4 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1606238 3950082
Geekbench Single 1880 3639
Geekbench Multi 5100 11047
Display 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2856x1280 1828x2448
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 37W 45W
Wireless charging 23W —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 0 MP
Front camera 42 MP 10 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 17 / One UI 9
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 152.8×72.0×8.5 mm 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm
Weight 199 g 201 g
Launch price $999 —

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
80
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro

  • 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2856x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1828x2448
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
50
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4
72/100
1606238 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
74/100 +59.3%
3950082 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Google Pixel 9 Pro by 59.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro

$999

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (98/100 vs 73/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro is a bit better (88/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (80/100 vs 50/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Google Pixel 9 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (74/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro leads on camera score (80/100 vs 50/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 73/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.