Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26

The Google Pixel 9 Pro (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; estimated prices are $999 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads — 54/100 vs 50/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Google Pixel 9 Pro has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 4000); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is faster in AnTuTu (2,856,499 vs 1,499,601); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 199g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Performance 25
Display 100
Camera 77
Battery 37
Design 51
Value for money 41
Samsung Galaxy S26
Performance 64
Display 100
Camera 35
Battery 15
Design 97
Value for money 55
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 4700 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 37W vs 25W
  • Faster wireless charging: 23W vs 15W

  • Better camera (77/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (37/100 vs 15/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2856499 vs 1499601
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2880 vs 1880
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9100 vs 5100
  • Lighter: 162g vs 199g
  • Cheaper: $799 vs $999

  • Higher performance (64/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (97/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better value for money (55/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy S26, the Samsung Galaxy S26 scores 4 points higher (54/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (64/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro leads (77/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro leads (37/100 vs 15/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (55/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (64/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (77/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (37/100 vs 15/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (97/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (55/100 vs 41/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro: The Google Pixel 9 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy S26: The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S26
Processor Google Tensor G4 Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 1499601 2856499
Geekbench Single 1880 2880
Geekbench Multi 5100 9100
Display 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2856x1280 2340x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 4000 mAh
Charging 37W 25W
Wireless charging 23W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 10 MP
Front camera 42 MP 12 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 152.8×72.0×8.5 mm 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm
Weight 199 g 162 g
Price $999 $799
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
77
camera
Samsung Galaxy S26
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
35
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro
  • 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2856x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy S26
  • 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
37
battery
Samsung Galaxy S26
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
15
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4
50/100
1499601 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600
54/100 +47.5%
2856499 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 leads Google Pixel 9 Pro by 47.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 9 Pro
$999
Samsung Galaxy S26
$799

Price difference: $200. Samsung Galaxy S26 is cheaper by $200.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (64/100 vs 25/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (77/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (37/100 vs 15/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (97/100 vs 51/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (55/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 — 54/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro leads on camera score (77/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on performance (64/100 vs 25/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for active users.