Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Poco F7 Ultra

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1799 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Ultra leads — 82/100 vs 64/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Ultra has the bigger battery (5300 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,932,885 vs 1,401,321); the Poco F7 Ultra is noticeably lighter (212g vs 257g).

The Poco F7 Ultra is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Performance 70
Display 78
Camera 64
Battery 42
Portability 52
Value for money 36

Poco F7 Ultra

Performance 90
Display 90
Camera 71
Battery 84
Portability 48
Value for money 86

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?


  • Better portability (52/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2932885 vs 1401321
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1707
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4431
  • Bigger battery: 5300 vs 4650 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 21W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W
  • Lighter: 212g vs 257g
  • Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (71/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Poco F7 Ultra, the Poco F7 Ultra scores 18 points higher (82/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 36/100, Poco F7 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (84/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Poco F7 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users.
Poco F7 Ultra: The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Poco F7 Ultra
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1401321 2932885
Geekbench Single 1707 3013
Geekbench Multi 4431 9287
Display 8.0" AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2076x2152 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4650 mAh 5300 mAh
Charging 21W 120W
Wireless charging 7W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 129 —
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 32 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68
Dimensions 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm
Weight 257 g 212 g
Launch price $1799 $500

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
64
camera

Poco F7 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
71
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 8.0" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2076x2152
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Poco F7 Ultra

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 4650 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • Wireless: 7W
42
battery

Poco F7 Ultra

  • 5300 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Poco F7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4
64/100
1401321 AnTuTu
Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100 +52.2%
2932885 AnTuTu

Poco F7 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 52.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

$1799

Poco F7 Ultra

$500

Launch price difference: $1299. Poco F7 Ultra was $1299 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (90/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (84/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Poco F7 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Poco F7 Ultra is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Poco F7 Ultra — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Poco F7 Ultra leads on camera score (71/100 vs 64/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Poco F7 Ultra leads on performance (90/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.