Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Motorola Moto G35

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Motorola Moto G35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc T760; estimated prices are $1799 and $187. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads — 39/100 vs 33/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G35 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is faster in AnTuTu (1,401,321 vs 628,581); the Motorola Moto G35 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 257g).

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold edges out the Motorola Moto G35 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Performance 20
Display 100
Camera 64
Battery 29
Design 0
Value for money 0
Motorola Moto G35
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 31
Battery 36
Design 65
Value for money 97
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1401321 vs 628581
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1750 vs 746
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4516 vs 2186
  • Faster charging: 21W vs 18W

  • Higher performance (20/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (64/100 vs 31/100)
What makes Motorola Moto G35 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4650 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Lighter: 188g vs 257g
  • Cheaper: $187 vs $1799

  • Longer battery life (36/100 vs 29/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (97/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Motorola Moto G35, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold scores 6 points higher (39/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads (64/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G35 leads (97/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (64/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G35 is a bit better (36/100 vs 29/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (65/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (97/100 vs 0/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use.
Motorola Moto G35: The Motorola Moto G35 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Motorola Moto G35
Processor Google Tensor G4 Unisoc T760
AnTuTu 1401321 628581
Geekbench Single 1750 746
Geekbench Multi 4516 2186
Display 8.0" AMOLED 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 2076x2152 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4650 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 21W 18W
Wireless charging 7W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 129
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 16 MP
RAM 16GB 4GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 14 Android 14
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits 1000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8
Dimensions 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm 166.3×76.0×7.8 mm
Weight 257 g 188 g
Price $1799 $187
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
64
camera
Motorola Moto G35
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
31
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • 8.0" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2076x2152
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Motorola Moto G35
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • 4650 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • Wireless: 7W
29
battery
Motorola Moto G35
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Motorola Moto G35, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4
39/100
1401321 AnTuTu
Motorola Moto G35 Unisoc T760
33/100 -122.9%
628581 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads Motorola Moto G35 by 122.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
$1799
Motorola Moto G35
$187

Price difference: $1612. Motorola Moto G35 is cheaper by $1612.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (20/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (64/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G35 is a bit better (36/100 vs 29/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (65/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (97/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Motorola Moto G35?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold edges out the Motorola Moto G35 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Motorola Moto G35?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Motorola Moto G35 — 33/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Motorola Moto G35?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads on camera score (64/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Motorola Moto G35?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads on performance (20/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Motorola Moto G35?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use. The Motorola Moto G35 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.