Google Pixel 8a vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Google Pixel 8a (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $499 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 65/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4492); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,433,693); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 136); the Google Pixel 8a is noticeably lighter (188g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a by 22 points (87/100 vs 65/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 8a
Performance 70
Display 82
Camera 70
Battery 39
Portability 57
Value for money 56
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Google Pixel 8a better?
  • Lighter: 188g vs 226g
  • Cheaper: $499 vs $899

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1433693
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1722
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4458
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4492 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 7W

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 8a vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 22 points higher (87/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (93/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Google Pixel 8a are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (81/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8a is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (86/100 vs 56/100).

Google Pixel 8a: The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 8a Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G3 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1433693 3269794
Geekbench Single 1722 3228
Geekbench Multi 4458 9553
Display 6.1" OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4492 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 18W 90W
Wireless charging 7W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 136 171
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IP68
Dimensions 152.1×72.7×8.9 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 188 g 226 g
Price $499 $899
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 8a
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.89
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
70
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 8a
  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 8a
  • 4492 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • Wireless: 7W
39
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 8a and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3
65/100
1433693 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +56.2%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Google Pixel 8a by 56.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 8a
$499
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Price difference: $400. Google Pixel 8a is cheaper by $400.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (93/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Google Pixel 8a are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (96/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (81/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8a is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (86/100 vs 56/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 8a or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a by 22 points (87/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 8a and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 8a has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 8a or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 8a or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 8a over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.