Google Pixel 8a vs Honor Magic 7 Pro

The Google Pixel 8a (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G3, while the Honor Magic 7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $499 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads — 82/100 vs 65/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic 7 Pro has the bigger battery (5270 mAh vs 4492); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor Magic 7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,018,146 vs 1,433,693); per DXOMark lab testing, the Honor Magic 7 Pro has the stronger camera (148 vs 136); the Google Pixel 8a is noticeably lighter (188g vs 223g).

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 8a — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 8a
Performance 70
Display 82
Camera 70
Battery 39
Portability 57
Value for money 56
Honor Magic 7 Pro
Performance 91
Display 84
Camera 79
Battery 80
Portability 36
Value for money 76
What makes Google Pixel 8a better?
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 188g vs 223g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1099

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 36/100)
What makes Honor Magic 7 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3018146 vs 1433693
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 1722
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 4458
  • Bigger battery: 5270 vs 4492 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 7W

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (79/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 8a vs the Honor Magic 7 Pro, the Honor Magic 7 Pro scores 17 points higher (82/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Google Pixel 8a — 56/100, Honor Magic 7 Pro — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the Google Pixel 8a are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (80/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8a notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (57/100 vs 36/100).

Google Pixel 8a: The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users.
Honor Magic 7 Pro: The Honor Magic 7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 8a Honor Magic 7 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1433693 3018146
Geekbench Single 1722 3057
Geekbench Multi 4458 9302
Display 6.1" OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 2800x1280
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4492 mAh 5270 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 7W 80W
DXOMark (camera) 136 148
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits 5000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IP69
Dimensions 152.1×72.7×8.9 mm 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm
Weight 188 g 223 g
Launch price $499 $1099
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 8a
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.89
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
70
camera
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
79
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 8a
  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 8a
  • 4492 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • Wireless: 7W
39
battery
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • 5270 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 8a and Honor Magic 7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3
65/100
1433693 AnTuTu
Honor Magic 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100 +52.5%
3018146 AnTuTu

Honor Magic 7 Pro leads Google Pixel 8a by 52.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 8a
$499
Honor Magic 7 Pro
$1099

Launch price difference: $600. Google Pixel 8a was $600 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (91/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the Google Pixel 8a are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (80/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8a notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (57/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 8a or the Honor Magic 7 Pro?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 8a — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 8a and the Honor Magic 7 Pro?

The Google Pixel 8a has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Honor Magic 7 Pro — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 8a or the Honor Magic 7 Pro?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro leads on camera score (79/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 8a or the Honor Magic 7 Pro?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 8a over the Honor Magic 7 Pro?

The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users. The Honor Magic 7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.