Google Pixel 3a vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Google Pixel 3a (2019) runs on the Snapdragon 670, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $399 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 27/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,258,010 vs 322,015); the Google Pixel 3a is noticeably lighter (147g vs 226g).
Google Pixel 3a
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 147g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $899
- Better portability (81/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3258010 vs 322015
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 381
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1239
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 26/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 59/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 3a vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 60 points higher (87/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 12/100). Value score: Google Pixel 3a — 0/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (93/100 vs 26/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (84/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (81/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 3a significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (81/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 3a | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 670 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 322015 | 3258010 | |
| Geekbench Single | 381 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1239 | 9553 | |
| Display | 5.6" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2220 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 Pie | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.3×70.1×8.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 147 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $899 |
Google Pixel 3a
- Main: 12MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Google Pixel 3a
- 5.6" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2220
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 3a
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Google Pixel 3a and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Google Pixel 3a by 90.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $500. Google Pixel 3a was $500 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (93/100 vs 26/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (84/100 vs 59/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (81/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 3a significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (81/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 3a or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a by 60 points (87/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 3a and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Google Pixel 3a has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 3a or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 3a or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 26/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 3a over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Google Pixel 3a is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.