Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs Sharp Aquos R9
The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Sharp Aquos R9 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; launch prices were $1199 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads — 76/100 vs 68/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Sharp Aquos R9 is faster in AnTuTu (1,660,924 vs 1,617,706); the Sharp Aquos R9 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 232g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Sharp Aquos R9
What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro XL better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2296 vs 1860
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6203 vs 5045
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher performance (77/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (90/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (62/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R9 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1660924 vs 1617706
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 232g
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1199
- Better display (90/100 vs 86/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 35/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs the Sharp Aquos R9, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL scores 8 points higher (76/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads (90/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads (62/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Google Pixel 10 Pro XL — 62/100, Sharp Aquos R9 — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and the Sharp Aquos R9 are nearly equal (77/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 and the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL are nearly equal (90/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (90/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (62/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (52/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 10 Pro XL | Sharp Aquos R9 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 1617706 | 1660924 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2296 | 1860 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6203 | 5045 | |
| Display | 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2992x1344 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 39W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 163 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 42 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3300 nits | 2000 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm | 156.0×75.0×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 232 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | $1199 | $599 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
- Main: 50MP f/1.68
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 42MP
Sharp Aquos R9
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
- 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2992x1344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Sharp Aquos R9
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 39W
- Wireless: 25W
Sharp Aquos R9
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and Sharp Aquos R9, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Sharp Aquos R9 leads Google Pixel 10 Pro XL by 2.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $600. Sharp Aquos R9 was $600 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and the Sharp Aquos R9 are nearly equal (77/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 and the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL are nearly equal (90/100 vs 86/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (90/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (62/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (52/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL edges out the Sharp Aquos R9 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Sharp Aquos R9 — 68/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads on camera score (90/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL over the Sharp Aquos R9?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Sharp Aquos R9 is a better fit for active users.