Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs Sharp Aquos R11
The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Sharp Aquos R11 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads — 76/100 vs 74/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5100); the Sharp Aquos R11 is faster in AnTuTu (2,314,417 vs 1,617,706); the Sharp Aquos R11 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 232g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Sharp Aquos R11
What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro XL better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2296 vs 2072
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 39W vs 36W
- Better camera (90/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (62/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R11 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2314417 vs 1617706
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6649 vs 6203
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 232g
- Higher performance (81/100 vs 77/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 86/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 35/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs the Sharp Aquos R11, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL scores 2 points higher (76/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads (62/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL are nearly equal (81/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL are nearly equal (90/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (62/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (52/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 10 Pro XL | Sharp Aquos R11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G5 | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 1617706 | 2314417 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2296 | 2072 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6203 | 6649 | |
| Display | 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2992x1344 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 39W | 36W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 163 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 38 MP | |
| Front camera | 42 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3300 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm | 156.0×74.0×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 232 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | $1199 | — |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
- Main: 50MP f/1.68
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 42MP
Sharp Aquos R11
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 38MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
- 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2992x1344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Sharp Aquos R11
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 39W
- Wireless: 25W
Sharp Aquos R11
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 36W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and Sharp Aquos R11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Sharp Aquos R11 leads Google Pixel 10 Pro XL by 30.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R11
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL are nearly equal (81/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL are nearly equal (90/100 vs 86/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (62/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (52/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL edges out the Sharp Aquos R11 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Sharp Aquos R11 — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads on camera score (90/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL over the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Sharp Aquos R11 is a better fit for gamers and power users.