Fairphone 3+ vs Motorola Razr 60

The Fairphone 3+ (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 632, while the Motorola Razr 60 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X; estimated prices are $489 and $700. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 leads — 33/100 vs 13/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 3040); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 is faster in AnTuTu (886,677 vs 243,691).

The Motorola Razr 60 significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 20 points (33/100 vs 13/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Fairphone 3+
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 26
Battery 0
Design 63
Value for money 76
Motorola Razr 60
Performance 3
Display 100
Camera 39
Battery 27
Design 65
Value for money 62
What makes Fairphone 3+ better?
  • Cheaper: $489 vs $700

  • Better value for money (76/100 vs 62/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 60 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 886677 vs 243691
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 295
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 3185 vs 1037
  • Bigger battery: 4500 vs 3040 mAh
  • Faster charging: 30W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Lighter: 188g vs 189g

  • Higher performance (3/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (39/100 vs 26/100)
  • Longer battery life (27/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 63/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Fairphone 3+ vs the Motorola Razr 60, the Motorola Razr 60 scores 20 points higher (33/100 vs 13/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 leads (39/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ leads (76/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 and the Fairphone 3+ are nearly equal (3/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 is a bit better (39/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 60 and the Fairphone 3+ are nearly equal (65/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ is a bit better (76/100 vs 62/100).

Fairphone 3+: The Fairphone 3+ is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Motorola Razr 60: The Motorola Razr 60 is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Fairphone 3+ Motorola Razr 60
Processor Snapdragon 632 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
AnTuTu 243691 886677
Geekbench Single 295 1061
Geekbench Multi 1037 3185
Display 5.7" IPS LCD 6.9" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2160 2640x1080
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3040 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 18W 30W
Wireless charging 0W 5W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 13 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 8GB
Storage 64GB 256GB
OS Android 10 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1700 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8
Dimensions 158.0×71.8×9.9 mm
Weight 189 g 188 g
Price $489 $700
Camera comparison
Fairphone 3+
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
26
camera
Motorola Razr 60
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
39
camera
Display comparison
Fairphone 3+
  • 5.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2160
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Motorola Razr 60
  • 6.9" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Fairphone 3+
  • 3040 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
0
battery
Motorola Razr 60
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 5W
27
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Fairphone 3+ and Motorola Razr 60, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Fairphone 3+ Snapdragon 632
13/100
243691 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
33/100 +72.5%
886677 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 leads Fairphone 3+ by 72.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Fairphone 3+
$489
Motorola Razr 60
$700

Price difference: $211. Fairphone 3+ is cheaper by $211.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 and the Fairphone 3+ are nearly equal (3/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 is a bit better (39/100 vs 26/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (27/100 vs 0/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 60 and the Fairphone 3+ are nearly equal (65/100 vs 63/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ is a bit better (76/100 vs 62/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr 60?

The Motorola Razr 60 significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 20 points (33/100 vs 13/100).

What is the rating of the Fairphone 3+ and the Motorola Razr 60?

The Fairphone 3+ has a MobileRank rating of 13/100, the Motorola Razr 60 — 33/100.

Which has the better camera: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr 60?

The Motorola Razr 60 leads on camera score (39/100 vs 26/100).

Should you choose the Fairphone 3+ over the Motorola Razr 60?

The Fairphone 3+ is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Motorola Razr 60 is a better fit for everyday use.