Fairphone 3+ vs Motorola Razr 60

The Fairphone 3+ (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 632, while the Motorola Razr 60 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X; launch prices were $489 and $700. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 leads — 54/100 vs 26/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 3040); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 is faster in AnTuTu (886,677 vs 243,691).

The Motorola Razr 60 significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 28 points (54/100 vs 26/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Fairphone 3+

Performance 18
Display 44
Camera 31
Battery 15
Portability 50
Value for money 0

Motorola Razr 60

Performance 56
Display 81
Camera 42
Battery 41
Portability 72
Value for money 22

What makes Fairphone 3+ better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $489 vs $700

  • Overall rating 26/100

What makes Motorola Razr 60 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 886677 vs 243691
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 295
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 3185 vs 1037
  • Bigger battery: 4500 vs 3040 mAh
  • Faster charging: 30W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Lighter: 188g vs 189g

  • Higher performance (56/100 vs 18/100)
  • Better camera (42/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (41/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better portability (72/100 vs 50/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Fairphone 3+ vs the Motorola Razr 60, the Motorola Razr 60 scores 28 points higher (54/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 leads (56/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 leads (42/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 leads (41/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Fairphone 3+ — 0/100, Motorola Razr 60 — 22/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (56/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 is a bit better (42/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (41/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (72/100 vs 50/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Fairphone 3+ Motorola Razr 60
Processor Snapdragon 632 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
AnTuTu 243691 886677
Geekbench Single 295 1061
Geekbench Multi 1037 3185
Display 5.7" IPS LCD 6.9" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2160 2640x1080
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3040 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 18W 30W
Wireless charging — 5W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 13 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 8GB
Storage 64GB 256GB
OS Android 10 Android 15
Brightness (peak) — 1700 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IPX8
Dimensions 158.0×71.8×9.9 mm —
Weight 189 g 188 g
Launch price $489 $700

Camera comparison

Fairphone 3+

  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
31
camera

Motorola Razr 60

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
42
camera

Display comparison

Fairphone 3+

  • 5.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2160
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
44
display

Motorola Razr 60

  • 6.9" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Fairphone 3+

  • 3040 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery

Motorola Razr 60

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 5W
41
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Fairphone 3+ and Motorola Razr 60, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Fairphone 3+ Snapdragon 632
26/100
243691 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
54/100 +72.5%
886677 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 leads Fairphone 3+ by 72.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Fairphone 3+

$489

Motorola Razr 60

$700

Launch price difference: $211. Fairphone 3+ was $211 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (56/100 vs 18/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (81/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 is a bit better (42/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (41/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (72/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr 60?

The Motorola Razr 60 significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 28 points (54/100 vs 26/100).

What is the rating of the Fairphone 3+ and the Motorola Razr 60?

The Fairphone 3+ has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Motorola Razr 60 — 54/100.

Which has the better camera: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr 60?

The Motorola Razr 60 leads on camera score (42/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr 60?

The Motorola Razr 60 leads on performance (56/100 vs 18/100).

Should you choose the Fairphone 3+ over the Motorola Razr 60?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Motorola Razr 60 (56/100 vs 18/100).