Apple iPhone Fold vs Redmi K80 Ultra
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Redmi K80 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone Fold leads — 77/100 vs 73/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi K80 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,874,956 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Redmi K80 Ultra
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 2729
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 8430
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (53/100 vs 37/100)
What makes Redmi K80 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2874956 vs 2538751
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Redmi K80 Ultra, the Apple iPhone Fold scores 4 points higher (77/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold leads (53/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Redmi K80 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (53/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Redmi K80 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 2874956 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 8430 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 1280x2772 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 7410 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Weight | — | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $350 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Redmi K80 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K80 Ultra
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Redmi K80 Ultra
- 7410 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Redmi K80 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K80 Ultra leads Apple iPhone Fold by 11.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Redmi K80 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (53/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold edges out the Redmi K80 Ultra by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Redmi K80 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold leads on camera score (53/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Redmi K80 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.