Apple iPhone Fold vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone Fold leads — 77/100 vs 71/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,726,802 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 8932
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (53/100 vs 37/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2726802 vs 2538751
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Apple iPhone Fold scores 6 points higher (77/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold leads (53/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (53/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 2726802 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 2725 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 8932 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 9000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $300 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Apple iPhone Fold by 6.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (53/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Apple iPhone Fold edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 Max by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Apple iPhone Fold leads on camera score (53/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.