Apple iPhone Air vs OPPO Reno16 Pro

The Apple iPhone Air (2025) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super; launch prices were $999 and $600. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 75/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 3149); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,538,751); the Apple iPhone Air is noticeably lighter (165g vs 188g).

The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Apple iPhone Air by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Apple iPhone Air

Performance 92
Display 85
Camera 73
Battery 26
Portability 96
Value for money 60

OPPO Reno16 Pro

Performance 82
Display 95
Camera 94
Battery 66
Portability 64
Value for money 80

What makes Apple iPhone Air better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3850 vs 1555
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9800 vs 6405
  • Lighter: 165g vs 188g

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better portability (96/100 vs 64/100)

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2538751
  • Bigger battery: 6700 vs 3149 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 40W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $999

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 73/100)
  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 26/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 85/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone Air vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 8 points higher (83/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Air leads (92/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 26/100). Value score: Apple iPhone Air — 60/100, OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Air is a bit better (92/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (94/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (66/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone Air significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (96/100 vs 64/100).

Apple iPhone Air: The Apple iPhone Air is a better fit for gamers and power users.
OPPO Reno16 Pro: The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Apple iPhone Air OPPO Reno16 Pro
Processor Apple A19 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
AnTuTu 2538751 3079298
Geekbench Single 3850 1555
Geekbench Multi 9800 6405
Display 6.5" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 6.3" AMOLED
Resolution 2736x1260 1216x2640
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3149 mAh 6700 mAh
Charging 40W 80W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 141 —
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS iOS 26 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 6.0×74.7×5.6 mm 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm
Weight 165 g 188 g
Launch price $999 $600

Camera comparison

Apple iPhone Air

  • Main: 48MP f/1.6
  • Front: 12MP
73
camera

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Apple iPhone Air

  • 6.5" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2736x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
95
display

Battery and charging

Apple iPhone Air

  • 3149 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 7:48 hrs, total 22:15 hrs
  • Wired: 40W
  • Wireless: 25W
26
battery

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone Air and OPPO Reno16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone Air Apple A19 Pro
75/100
2538751 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
83/100 +17.6%
3079298 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Apple iPhone Air by 17.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Apple iPhone Air

$999

OPPO Reno16 Pro

$600

Launch price difference: $399. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $399 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Air is a bit better (92/100 vs 82/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (94/100 vs 73/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (66/100 vs 26/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone Air significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (96/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Apple iPhone Air or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Apple iPhone Air by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Air and the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The Apple iPhone Air has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro — 83/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Air or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 73/100).

Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone Air or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The Apple iPhone Air leads on performance (92/100 vs 82/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone Air over the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The Apple iPhone Air is a better fit for gamers and power users. The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.