Apple iPhone 17 vs Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

The Apple iPhone 17 (2025) runs on the Apple A19, while the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $799 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 67/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3692); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 2,450,000); the Apple iPhone 17 is noticeably lighter (177g vs 199g).

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 17
Performance 90
Display 85
Camera 49
Battery 29
Portability 73
Value for money 46
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Performance 93
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money 62
What makes Apple iPhone 17 better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3608 vs 3041
  • Lighter: 177g vs 199g
  • Cheaper: $799 vs $1499

  • Better portability (73/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 2450000
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 8810
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3692 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 40W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 25W

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better camera (60/100 vs 49/100)
  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 29/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better value for money (62/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 17 vs the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 11 points higher (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 29/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (62/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Apple iPhone 17 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 (64/100 vs 29/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17 is a bit better (73/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 (62/100 vs 46/100).

Apple iPhone 17: The Apple iPhone 17 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Apple iPhone 17 Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Processor Apple A19 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2450000 3379591
Geekbench Single 3608 3041
Geekbench Multi 8810 9494
Display 6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2622x1206 1224x2992
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 3692 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 40W 68W
Wireless charging 25W 30W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB
OS iOS 26 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 5000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 149.6×71.5×8.0 mm 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 177 g 199 g
Price $799 $1499
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 17
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Front: 12MP
49
camera
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 17
  • 6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2622x1206
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 17
  • 3692 mAh
  • Wired: 40W
  • Wireless: 25W
29
battery
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
64
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 17 and Motorola Razr Ultra 2026, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19
67/100
2450000 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100 +27.5%
3379591 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Apple iPhone 17 by 27.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Apple iPhone 17
$799
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
$1499

Price difference: $700. Apple iPhone 17 is cheaper by $700.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Apple iPhone 17 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (60/100 vs 49/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 (64/100 vs 29/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17 is a bit better (73/100 vs 68/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 (62/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17 or the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?

The Apple iPhone 17 has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 78/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 17 or the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 49/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17 over the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?

The Apple iPhone 17 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.