Apple iPhone 16e vs Poco F7 Pro
The Apple iPhone 16e (2025) runs on the Apple A18, while the Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $599 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 56/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 3279); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,301,212 vs 1,972,476); the Apple iPhone 16e is noticeably lighter (167g vs 220g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16e
Poco F7 Pro
What makes Apple iPhone 16e better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3254 vs 3013
- Lighter: 167g vs 220g
- Better portability (80/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2301212 vs 1972476
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 8070
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 3279 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 20W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $599
- Higher performance (87/100 vs 85/100)
- Better camera (67/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 19/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16e vs the Poco F7 Pro, the Poco F7 Pro scores 24 points higher (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (67/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 19/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16e — 26/100, Poco F7 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Apple iPhone 16e are nearly equal (87/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (90/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (67/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (87/100 vs 19/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (80/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16e | Poco F7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1972476 | 2301212 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3254 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8070 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.1" OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2532x1170 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3279 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 167 g | 220 g | |
| Launch price | $599 | $499 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16e
- Main: 48MP f/1.6
- Front: 12MP
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16e
- 6.1" OLED
- Resolution: 2532x1170
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16e
- 3279 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- Wireless: 7W
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone 16e and Poco F7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Pro leads Apple iPhone 16e by 14.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $100. Poco F7 Pro was $100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Apple iPhone 16e are nearly equal (87/100 vs 85/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (90/100 vs 61/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (67/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (87/100 vs 19/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16e significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (80/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16e or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e by 24 points (80/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16e and the Poco F7 Pro?
The Apple iPhone 16e has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Poco F7 Pro — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16e or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro leads on camera score (67/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16e over the Poco F7 Pro?
The Apple iPhone 16e is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.