Apple iPhone 16 vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Apple iPhone 16 (2024) runs on the Apple A18, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $799 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 68/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 3561); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,972,476); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 147); the Apple iPhone 16 is noticeably lighter (170g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Apple iPhone 16 better?
- Lighter: 170g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $889
- Better portability (79/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1972476
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 7700
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 3561 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 84/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 18 points higher (86/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16 — 50/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (89/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (93/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (78/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (79/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1972476 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7700 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.1" Super Retina XDR OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2556x1179 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3561 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 147 | 167 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 147.6×71.6×7.8 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 170 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16
- Main: 48MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16
- 6.1" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2556x1179
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16
- 3561 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone 16 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Apple iPhone 16 by 36.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $90. Apple iPhone 16 was $90 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (89/100 vs 61/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (93/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 (78/100 vs 24/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (79/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 16 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 84/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.