Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Vivo X300s
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $999 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 73/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 3582); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,782,199); the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Vivo X300s
What makes Apple iPhone 16 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3400 vs 3293
- Lighter: 199g vs 217g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1782199
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 8300
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 3582 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
- Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $999
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 85/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 16 points higher (89/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 85/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16 Pro — 56/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (83/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 Pro | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1782199 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3400 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8300 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2622x1206 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3582 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 149.6×71.5×8.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $999 | $723 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/1.78
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2622x1206
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 3582 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro by 51.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $276. Vivo X300s was $276 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (83/100 vs 24/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 16 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Vivo X300s?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 86/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 85/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro over the Vivo X300s?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.