Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max vs Vivo X300s

The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (2021) runs on the Apple A15 Bionic, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1099 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 67/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4352); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,413,275); the Vivo X300s is noticeably lighter (217g vs 240g).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max by 22 points (89/100 vs 67/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

Performance 75
Display 85
Camera 73
Battery 38
Portability 39
Value for money 44

Vivo X300s

Performance 95
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max better?


  • Overall rating 67/100

What makes Vivo X300s better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1413275
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2315
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5753
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4352 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 20W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 217g vs 240g
  • Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 73/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 38/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better portability (42/100 vs 39/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 22 points higher (89/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 38/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max — 44/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (94/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (83/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s and the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max: The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Vivo X300s
Processor Apple A15 Bionic Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1413275 3703823
Geekbench Single 2315 3293
Geekbench Multi 5753 10243
Display 6.7" Super Retina XDR OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1284x2778 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4352 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 20W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 141 —
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 15 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits —
NFC yes —
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 160.8×78.1×7.7 mm —
Weight 240 g 217 g
Launch price $1099 $723

Camera comparison

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

  • Main: 12MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
73
camera

Vivo X300s

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

  • 6.7" Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 1284x2778
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Vivo X300s

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

  • 4352 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • Wireless: 15W
38
battery

Vivo X300s

  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic
67/100
1413275 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +61.8%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max by 61.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

$1099

Vivo X300s

$723

Launch price difference: $376. Vivo X300s was $376 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (95/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (94/100 vs 73/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (83/100 vs 38/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s and the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max by 22 points (89/100 vs 67/100).

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max and the Vivo X300s?

The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 73/100).

Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max over the Vivo X300s?

The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.