ZTE Axon 40 vs ZTE Blade A36
The ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870, while the ZTE Blade A36 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 30/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 13 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A36 doesn't.
ZTE Axon 40
ZTE Blade A36
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 560
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 1700
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (73/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (53/100 vs 52/100)
- Overall rating 30/100
Comparing the ZTE Axon 40 vs the ZTE Blade A36, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 28 points higher (58/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (61/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (51/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A36 (61/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A36 (73/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A36 (51/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the ZTE Blade A36 are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | ZTE Axon 40 | ZTE Blade A36 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | Unisoc T7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 1010069 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1298 | 560 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3520 | 1700 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 10W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 44 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | — | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 12 Snow Cone | Android 15 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | 167.6×77.4×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
ZTE Blade A36
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A36
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A36
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A36 (61/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A36 (73/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A36 (51/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the ZTE Blade A36 are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the ZTE Axon 40 or the ZTE Blade A36?
The ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A36 by 28 points (58/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the ZTE Axon 40 and the ZTE Blade A36?
The ZTE Axon 40 has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the ZTE Blade A36 — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the ZTE Axon 40 or the ZTE Blade A36?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the ZTE Axon 40 or the ZTE Blade A36?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (61/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the ZTE Axon 40 over the ZTE Blade A36?
The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Blade A36 is a better fit for everyday use.