ZTE Angel Care X13 vs ZTE Axon 40
The ZTE Angel Care X13 (2022) runs on the Spreadtrum Unisoc, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 25/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Angel Care X13 doesn't.
ZTE Angel Care X13
ZTE Axon 40
- Lighter: 190g vs 200g
- Better portability (54/100 vs 53/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 16MP
- Better camera (51/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (73/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the ZTE Angel Care X13 vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 33 points higher (58/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (51/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (52/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (73/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (51/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (52/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Angel Care X13 and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | ZTE Angel Care X13 | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Spreadtrum Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | — | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 165.0×75.0×9.0 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
ZTE Angel Care X13
- Main: 16MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
ZTE Angel Care X13
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Angel Care X13
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (73/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (51/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (52/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Angel Care X13 and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the ZTE Angel Care X13 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 by 33 points (58/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the ZTE Angel Care X13 and the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Angel Care X13 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the ZTE Angel Care X13 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 12/100).
Should you choose the ZTE Angel Care X13 over the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Angel Care X13 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.