ZTE Angel Care X13 vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The ZTE Angel Care X13 (2022) runs on the Spreadtrum Unisoc, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 25/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 108 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 pro has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Angel Care X13 doesn't.
ZTE Angel Care X13
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Better portability (54/100 vs 52/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 16MP
- Better camera (44/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the ZTE Angel Care X13 vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 33 points higher (58/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (44/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (52/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (44/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (52/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Angel Care X13 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | ZTE Angel Care X13 | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Spreadtrum Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 65W | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | — | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 165.0×75.0×9.0 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
ZTE Angel Care X13
- Main: 16MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Angel Care X13
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Angel Care X13
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (89/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (44/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 (52/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Angel Care X13 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the ZTE Angel Care X13 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Angel Care X13 by 33 points (58/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the ZTE Angel Care X13 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Angel Care X13 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the ZTE Angel Care X13 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (44/100 vs 12/100).
Should you choose the ZTE Angel Care X13 over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Angel Care X13 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.