Xiaomi Civi 1S vs ZTE Axon 30S
The Xiaomi Civi 1S (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, while the ZTE Axon 30S (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi Civi 1S leads — 56/100 vs 54/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi Civi 1S has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 4200); the ZTE Axon 30S is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 820,210); the Xiaomi Civi 1S is noticeably lighter (166g vs 189g).
Xiaomi Civi 1S
ZTE Axon 30S
- Bigger battery: 4500 vs 4200 mAh
- Lighter: 166g vs 189g
- Better camera (48/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (40/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (90/100 vs 67/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 820210
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 1059
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 3012
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Xiaomi Civi 1S vs the ZTE Axon 30S, the Xiaomi Civi 1S scores 2 points higher (56/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 30S is a bit better (61/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Civi 1S and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi Civi 1S is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi Civi 1S is a bit better (40/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Civi 1S notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 30S (90/100 vs 67/100).
| Specification | Xiaomi Civi 1S | ZTE Axon 30S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 820210 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1059 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3012 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.5" OLED | 6.9" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 55W | 55W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 950 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.3×71.5×7.0 mm | 170.2×77.8×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 166 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Xiaomi Civi 1S
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 30S
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Xiaomi Civi 1S
- 6.5" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 30S
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi Civi 1S
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 55W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 30S
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 55W
- No wireless charging
We compared Xiaomi Civi 1S and ZTE Axon 30S, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 30S leads Xiaomi Civi 1S by 18.8% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 30S is a bit better (61/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Civi 1S and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi Civi 1S is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi Civi 1S is a bit better (40/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Civi 1S notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 30S (90/100 vs 67/100).
Which is better: the Xiaomi Civi 1S or the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Xiaomi Civi 1S edges out the ZTE Axon 30S by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Xiaomi Civi 1S and the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Xiaomi Civi 1S has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the ZTE Axon 30S — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Xiaomi Civi 1S or the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Xiaomi Civi 1S leads on camera score (48/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Xiaomi Civi 1S or the ZTE Axon 30S?
The ZTE Axon 30S leads on performance (61/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Xiaomi Civi 1S over the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Xiaomi Civi 1S is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 30S is a better fit for active users.