Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 59/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 1,119,714); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably lighter (204g vs 220g).

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
Performance 63
Display 89
Camera 46
Battery 54
Portability 32
Value for money
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Performance 69
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money
What makes Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS better?
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 1119714
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 1488
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 3373
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Lighter: 204g vs 220g

  • Higher performance (69/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 46/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 12 points higher (71/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (69/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (86/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (52/100 vs 32/100).

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS: The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a better fit for active users.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 1119714 1290942
Geekbench Single 1488 1675
Geekbench Multi 3373 4453
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1116x2480
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 120W 80W
Main camera 64 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 5 MP 64 MP
Front camera 20 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, Joy UI 12.8 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Dimensions 163.7×76.2×9.9 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 220 g 204 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 5MP
  • Front: 20MP
46
camera
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
54
battery
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS Qualcomm Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G
59/100
1119714 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 +13.3%
1290942 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS by 13.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (69/100 vs 63/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (86/100 vs 46/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS are nearly equal (56/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (52/100 vs 32/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 46/100).

Which is more powerful: the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (69/100 vs 63/100).

Should you choose the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.