Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 58/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,600,724 vs 1,010,069); the ZTE Axon 40 pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
ZTE Axon 40 pro
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3600724 vs 1010069
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1298
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3520
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 65W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 61/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 pro better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 31 points higher (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (97/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (93/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (80/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 3600724 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 166 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $999 | — |
Camera comparison
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Xiaomi 17 Ultra and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads ZTE Axon 40 pro by 256.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (97/100 vs 61/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (93/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (80/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro by 31 points (89/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 61/100).
Should you choose the Xiaomi 17 Ultra over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.