Xiaomi 15S Pro vs ZTE Axon 40
The Xiaomi 15S Pro (2025) runs on the Xiaomi XRING O1, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 15S Pro leads — 84/100 vs 58/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 15S Pro has the bigger battery (6100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Xiaomi 15S Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,998,904 vs 1,010,069).
Xiaomi 15S Pro
ZTE Axon 40
- Higher AnTuTu: 2998904 vs 1010069
- Better Geekbench Single: 2746 vs 1298
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8431 vs 3520
- Bigger battery: 6100 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 61/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 51/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 73/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 58/100
Comparing the Xiaomi 15S Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40, the Xiaomi 15S Pro scores 26 points higher (84/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro leads (89/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro leads (78/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro leads (77/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (89/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (90/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (78/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (77/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Xiaomi 15S Pro | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Xiaomi XRING O1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 2998904 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2746 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8431 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6100 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | — | 200 g | |
| Price | $760 | — |
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- 6100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Xiaomi 15S Pro and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 15S Pro leads ZTE Axon 40 by 196.9% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (89/100 vs 61/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (90/100 vs 73/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (78/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (77/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Xiaomi 15S Pro or the ZTE Axon 40?
The Xiaomi 15S Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 by 26 points (84/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Xiaomi 15S Pro and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Xiaomi 15S Pro has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Xiaomi 15S Pro or the ZTE Axon 40?
The Xiaomi 15S Pro leads on camera score (78/100 vs 51/100).
Which is more powerful: the Xiaomi 15S Pro or the ZTE Axon 40?
The Xiaomi 15S Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 61/100).
Should you choose the Xiaomi 15S Pro over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Xiaomi 15S Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.