Xiaomi 15 Ultra vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS

The Xiaomi 15 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads — 85/100 vs 59/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Xiaomi 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,030,376 vs 1,119,714).

The Xiaomi 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS by 26 points (85/100 vs 59/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 90
Camera 87
Battery 80
Portability 29
Value for money 82
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
Performance 63
Display 89
Camera 46
Battery 54
Portability 32
Value for money
What makes Xiaomi 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3030376 vs 1119714
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1488
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10200 vs 3373
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4500 mAh

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 46/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
What makes Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS better?
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 220g vs 225g

  • Better portability (32/100 vs 29/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Xiaomi 15 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra scores 26 points higher (85/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads (87/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (92/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (87/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (80/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS and the Xiaomi 15 Ultra are nearly equal (32/100 vs 29/100).

Xiaomi 15 Ultra: The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS: The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Xiaomi 15 Ultra Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G
AnTuTu 3030376 1119714
Geekbench Single 3050 1488
Geekbench Multi 10200 3373
Display 6.7" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 3200x1440 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 90W 120W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 159
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 5 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB
OS Android 15 / HyperOS 2 Android 12, Joy UI 12.8
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 161.3×75.3×9.4 mm 163.7×76.2×9.9 mm
Weight 225 g 220 g
Launch price $999
Camera comparison
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
87
camera
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 5MP
  • Front: 20MP
46
camera
Display comparison
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:19 hrs, total 30:03 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
54
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Xiaomi 15 Ultra and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
85/100
3030376 AnTuTu
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS Qualcomm Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G
59/100 -170.6%
1119714 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS by 170.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
$999
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (92/100 vs 63/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (87/100 vs 46/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (80/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS and the Xiaomi 15 Ultra are nearly equal (32/100 vs 29/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Xiaomi 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?

The Xiaomi 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS by 26 points (85/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Xiaomi 15 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?

The Xiaomi 15 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 85/100, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS — 59/100.

Which has the better camera: the Xiaomi 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?

The Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads on camera score (87/100 vs 46/100).

Which is more powerful: the Xiaomi 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?

The Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 63/100).

Should you choose the Xiaomi 15 Ultra over the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?

The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a better fit for active users.