Vivo Y77 (China) vs ZTE Blade A35
The Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930, while the ZTE Blade A35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 29/100 vs 16/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A35 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP.
Vivo Y77 (China)
ZTE Blade A35
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Overall rating 16/100
Comparing the Vivo Y77 (China) vs the ZTE Blade A35, the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 13 points higher (29/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Blade A35 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo Y77 (China) | ZTE Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Unisoc SC9863A1 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 846 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 2GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 14 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | 167.7×77.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A35
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A35
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A35
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Blade A35 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo Y77 (China) is noticeably better than the ZTE Blade A35 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo Y77 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the ZTE Blade A35 — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo Y77 (China) leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y77 (China) over the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A35 is a better fit for everyday use.