Vivo Y77 (China) vs ZTE AXON 50 5G
The Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930, while the ZTE AXON 50 5G (2023) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T760. Both devices score the same overall rating of 29/100. Key differences: the ZTE AXON 50 5G has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4500); the ZTE AXON 50 5G is noticeably lighter (178g vs 194g).
Vivo Y77 (China)
ZTE AXON 50 5G
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 31/100)
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4500 mAh
- Lighter: 178g vs 194g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (77/100 vs 57/100)
The Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE AXON 50 5G received the same MobileRank rating — 29/100. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE AXON 50 5G and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (39/100 vs 31/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE AXON 50 5G notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (77/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo Y77 (China) | ZTE AXON 50 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Unisoc Tiger T760 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2380 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 13 Tiramisu | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | 161.9×72.8×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 178 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE AXON 50 5G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE AXON 50 5G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2380
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE AXON 50 5G
- 4800 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE AXON 50 5G and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (39/100 vs 31/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE AXON 50 5G notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (77/100 vs 57/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE AXON 50 5G?
Both devices scored 29/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the ZTE AXON 50 5G.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE AXON 50 5G?
The Vivo Y77 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the ZTE AXON 50 5G — 29/100.
Should you choose the Vivo Y77 (China) over the ZTE AXON 50 5G?
The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE AXON 50 5G is a better fit for everyday use.