Vivo Y31d vs Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
Comparing the Vivo Y31d (2026) and the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y31d leads — 33/100 vs 5/100 (a 28-point difference).
Vivo Y31d
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (57/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (97/100 vs 55/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 26/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y31d vs the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra, the Vivo Y31d scores 28 points higher (33/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y31d leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d leads (57/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y31d notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (57/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y31d (50/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (97/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Vivo Y31d | Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 522680 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 489 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1532 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 1.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1570 | 466x466 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 44W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | — | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | — | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | — | |
| OS | Android 16 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1250 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm | — | |
| Weight | 219 g | — | |
| Price | $185 | — |
Vivo Y31d
- Main: 50MP f/f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
- Main: —
- Front: —
Vivo Y31d
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1570
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
- 1.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 466x466
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y31d
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
- —
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y31d notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (57/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y31d (50/100 vs 26/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (97/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Vivo Y31d or the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra?
The Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra by 28 points (33/100 vs 5/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y31d and the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra?
The Vivo Y31d has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra — 5/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y31d or the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra?
The Vivo Y31d leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y31d over the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra?
The Vivo Y31d is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.