Vivo Y23 Pro vs ZTE Axon 41 5G
The Vivo Y23 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (), while the ZTE Axon 41 5G (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. Both devices score the same overall rating of 56/100. Key differences: the ZTE Axon 41 5G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 41 5G is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 960,724); the ZTE Axon 41 5G has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y23 Pro doesn't; the Vivo Y23 Pro is noticeably lighter (171g vs 203g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y23 Pro
ZTE Axon 41 5G
What makes Vivo Y23 Pro better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Lighter: 171g vs 203g
- Better camera (52/100 vs 51/100)
- Better portability (83/100 vs 41/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 41 5G better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 960724
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 1143
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 3353
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4300 mAh
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 59/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
The Vivo Y23 Pro and the ZTE Axon 41 5G received the same MobileRank rating — 56/100. In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G leads (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G and the Vivo Y23 Pro are nearly equal (61/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 67/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro and the ZTE Axon 41 5G are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 41 5G (83/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y23 Pro | ZTE Axon 41 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 () | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 960724 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1143 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3353 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 1080x2376 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4300 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | — | — | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 Snow Cone | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 159.5×73.3×7.4 mm | 163.9×76.2×9.5 mm | |
| Weight | 171 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y23 Pro
- Main: 108MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y23 Pro
- 6.6"
- Resolution: 1080x2376
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y23 Pro
- 4300 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y23 Pro and ZTE Axon 41 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 41 5G leads Vivo Y23 Pro by 4.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G and the Vivo Y23 Pro are nearly equal (61/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 67/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro and the ZTE Axon 41 5G are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 41 5G (83/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y23 Pro or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
Both devices scored 56/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the ZTE Axon 41 5G (61/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y23 Pro and the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Vivo Y23 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the ZTE Axon 41 5G — 56/100.
Should you choose the Vivo Y23 Pro over the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The ZTE Axon 41 5G is a better fit for active users.