Vivo T2 (China) vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Vivo T2 (China) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 57/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 108 MP.
Vivo T2 (China)
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Faster charging: 80W vs 65W
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 52/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Vivo T2 (China) vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 1 points higher (58/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Vivo T2 (China) are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Vivo T2 (China) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo T2 (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Vivo T2 (China) | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 1010069 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1298 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3520 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.2×8.5 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Vivo T2 (China)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo T2 (China)
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo T2 (China)
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo T2 (China) and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Vivo T2 (China) are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Vivo T2 (China) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo T2 (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Vivo T2 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro edges out the Vivo T2 (China) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo T2 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Vivo T2 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Should you choose the Vivo T2 (China) over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Vivo T2 (China) is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.