Vivo S50 Pro mini vs Vivo Y500
The Vivo S50 Pro mini (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Vivo Y500 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7300; launch prices were $485 and $345. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads — 79/100 vs 56/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y500 has the bigger battery (8100 mAh vs 6500); the Vivo S50 Pro mini has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y500 doesn't; the Vivo S50 Pro mini is noticeably lighter (191g vs 210g).
Vivo S50 Pro mini
Vivo Y500
- Faster charging: 90W vs 44W
- Lighter: 191g vs 210g
- Better camera (64/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 51/100)
- Bigger battery: 8100 vs 6500 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $345 vs $485
- Overall rating 56/100
Comparing the Vivo S50 Pro mini vs the Vivo Y500, the Vivo S50 Pro mini scores 23 points higher (79/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (81/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Vivo S50 Pro mini — 86/100, Vivo Y500 — 52/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the Vivo Y500 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Vivo S50 Pro mini | Vivo Y500 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Unisoc T7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 2902731 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 2903 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9602 | — | |
| Display | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 8100 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm | 163.7×76.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | $485 | $345 |
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y500
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y500
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Vivo Y500
- 8100 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Launch price difference: $140. Vivo Y500 was $140 cheaper at launch.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the Vivo Y500 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (64/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (81/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Vivo S50 Pro mini or the Vivo Y500?
The Vivo S50 Pro mini significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 by 23 points (79/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the Vivo Y500?
The Vivo S50 Pro mini has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo Y500 — 56/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo S50 Pro mini or the Vivo Y500?
The Vivo S50 Pro mini leads on camera score (64/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Vivo S50 Pro mini over the Vivo Y500?
The Vivo S50 Pro mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y500 is a better fit for everyday use.